Niagara Falls Reporter
Home | Archive / Search
SEP 01 - SEP 08, 2015

Lewiston: The Poor Practice of Only Relying on Past Practice

By Daria Jurek

SEP 01, 2015


In any employment situation that isn’t spelled out clearly another way must be found to resolve an issue. At times whatever the “past practice” has been is used to make a decision. But when a policy manual or collective bargaining agreement contains language that can only be interpreted to mean one thing, there is no amount of past practice that should ever be considered to change those terms. More importantly, just because something has been done in the past doesn’t necessarily mean it was the proper thing to do to begin with.

Last month a request was made by the retiring Town of Lewiston Police Chief to be paid for over one thousand hours of accrued vacation and unused sick time. By all accounts Chris Salada was good man, a well-respected police officer, and an excellent Chief of Police. I can see why he felt that his request was both reasonable and fair in light of the fact that the Town Board had recently done the same thing for another employee.  

Current Town Clerk Donna Garfinkel chose to leave her hourly position to accept the Town Board’s appointment to the position she now holds. After winning a special election she requested over twenty-six thousand dollars in payment for the unused time she too had accumulated. During the Town Board’s deliberation Councilman Ron Winkley spoke out on her behalf and by saying it had been a “past practice” so the payment was unanimously approved.

I don’t blame Mrs. Garfinkel for accepting the Town Board’s generosity. I think almost anyone who found themselves in that situation would have done the very same thing. What troubles me is that no one bothered to look to see if there were any policy rules that covered such a situation. The only information presented to the board was that it had been done for someone else in the past so it was the proper thing to do now. So when Chief Salada decided to leave his positon it was only logical of him to ask that he be paid for his accrued time too.

But in Salada’s case, the Town Board noticed that the town’s employee policy manual actually limited those benefits to a total of four thousand dollars. So his request was referred to an executive session, and no further action was taken on the matter. I have no idea why an executive session was even necessary, but for all intents his request was denied.

There is a time when past practice should have some bearing on an important decision. But to automatically do whatever has been done in the past makes no sense at all to me. I am sure anyone who lives in Lewiston knows that there were a lot of things that were done in the past that should never be done again. They also realize that by blindly following whatever others have done you can easily repeat the same mistakes over and over.

So I have some advice for elected officials in Lewiston and everywhere else. If anyone offers “past practice” as a reason to make a decision on a matter, before any vote is taken your first question should be “Is this situation spelled out anywhere in our written policies or a collective bargaining agreement?”

If the answer is yes those policies and terms should be followed, and only if the answer is no you should you let common sense and a past practice guide your decision.






No Plea Negotiations or Settlement Talks in Kane Case, Source Confirms
Touma Calls for Special Meeting to Fund the Frozen Pipe Fix on 72nd Street
Wasting Taxpayer Cash to Fight Matteo Anello Verdict, is Very ‘Appealing’ to Mayor Dyster
Dyster’s Shameful Performance on 72nd Street He Denied it Before he Admitted it, he Hid it Before he Found it, And Passed the Buck Before he Took up the Cause...
72nd Street Residents’ Suffering Has Been Lost in the Dyster Shuffle
Mendacity and Duplicity as Dyster’s Water Boys Attempt Run to the Rescue
Stewart III Parrots Forster Line On 72nd Street Water Main Freeze
City Dems Expect Leaders To Work Together
Anderson’s Council Run Offers Voters Chance to Reelect a Good Honest Man!
Choolokian Supporters Rally at Local #91
Hastings to Sell Main Street Properties, Reporter has Learned
Staying at the Grand Hamister Hotel
Lewiston: Reiter Throws Support Behind Rose for Highway Super, But Why?
Cuomo's 2015 State Energy Plan More of the Same, Except Even More Local Hydropower Going to NYC
Roundup Part 2 Francine DelMonte Returns; a Host of Town and Country Races Reviewed
Kane Cooperating in Rape Probe, Sources Say
Lewiston’s Riverwalk Problems Continue Like Bad Dream
In Wheatfield, BSing About Manure
Lewiston: The Poor Practice of Only Relying on Past Practice
Accardo: Abolish ‘Dyster Double-Dip’ Insurance Subsidy For Mayoral Appointees, Council Members
Thoughts on the Dyster Campaign Flyer
Only in NT: We Want our City Back!
Szwedo Pushing Hard in GOP Primary for Mayor
Some Dyster Directed Disasters You May Have Forgotten About
Finger Pointing all Around as Welfare Rent Program Becomes Silly Season Fare
The FBI and Hillary “Rotten” Clinton
Big Daddy Dyster takes Mendacity, Duplicity to Entirely New Level Here
Ten More Reasons to Vote “Anybody But Dyster” in 2015
City Hall Jokes

Contact Info

©2014 The Niagara Falls Reporter Inc.
POB 3083, Niagara Falls, N.Y. 14304
Phone: (716) 284-5595

Publisher and Editor in Chief: Frank Parlato
Managing Editor: Dr. Chitra Selvaraj
Senior Editor: Tony Farina